Presenting four dozen media links to tree house coverage in the local and national press, and on a variety of local blogs, since fall 2015. The bizarre zoning kerfuffle over a kids fort has been covered by the Washington Post,
in several news stories and a couple of op-ed pieces. In the broadcast realm, footage of the castle-themed play fort aired on NBC affiliates across the country in January 2016. TV audiences learned about what Slate Magazine
dubbed "DC Tree House-gate" from Chicago to Chattanooga and Madison, from Des Moines to the Bay Area. The story also made the USA Today Network on-line edition.
We've found it interesting to compare and contrast coverage
the story generated from the Hill with that from farther afield. Older neighborhood commentators--CapitolHillCorner blog, Hill Now blog, Hill Rag--mostly cast us as willful law breakers. Local writers got quotes from the objecting
neighbors to use in their lead stories. They also interviewed James Loots, the former ANC 6B0-03 commissioner who advocated for the tree house's destruction on behalf of the neighbors. What they didn't do was interview us, or any
tree house fans. By contrast younger journalists reporting for media with a City-wide reach--WaPo, DC'ist, Popville, Metro Bugle, Channel 7 CBS WJLA and ABC WUSA9 TV news teams--spun their coverage in a balanced
The coverage most supportive of the tree house and its builders was found in two magazines with a national reach - Slate Magazine and Field and Stream. Their writers presented our family as having
been caught in a mess of bureacracy in a city where personal freedoms are incresingly curtailed, with the tree house as "monument
to freedom." In short, the battle of the alley tree house narratives on the best use of 20" of alley air space over mulch was drawn along clear generational and geographical lines.
We draw your attention to the media
links prefaced with an asterix for the most in-depth and accurate reporting. Dip into these reports to get a feel for how media coverage of the tree house war has tilted away from looking at a spat between neighbors and toward a story
about abuse of authority on the part of the DC government.
DECEMBER 27, 2018
*DCist bloggers Return to Archibald Walk after a 3-Year Break. The first in a three-part series on interesting DC alleys
by Dean Madsen, architectural writer for the popular DCist Food, Culture, Art & Events Blog. Archibald Walk is one of 10 interesting alleys the writer steers visitors to.
DECEMBER 28, 2018
*Dispatch from the Capitol Hill Tree House War 3.5 Years In. Summary
of developments by the witty Deane Madsen. He pretty clearly has a soft spot for the tree house, and the dragon-fly watchers who defend the castle.
JANUARY 16, 2018
*The DC Urban Turf Real Estate Blog Scoops the Story on the Federal
Lawsuit. Blogger Nena Perry-Brown focuses on DDOT's alleged denial of due process to the tree house builders in her write-up.
*The WASHINGTON POST Provides an Update on the Tree House Controversy after a 2-Year Break.
Dana Hegepeth describes how Bing files suit in Federal court to challenge DDOT's abusive permitting practices. The article generates several hundred comments.
Intellectual Take Out, a Refuge for Rational Discourse. "Is there a War on Childhood in America?" Blogger Lillie Thomas asks the question "Is there really a war on childhood?" She refers
to the "war" WaPo columnist Petula Dvorak had written about a year earlier in the context of the Hill tree house controvery, and similar NIMBY struggles.
JANUARY 2, 2017
Popville "The Beautiful Life" Blog, "Well this [Treehouse] is Awesome." 17 Comments. Pictures of a just-built tree house in 16th Street Heights NW which elicit entertaining
comments from readers poking fun at the DC anti-tree house movement launched by some of the Archibald Walk neighbors.
AUGUST 30, 2016
LIT's Living on the Hill Blog, "Archibald Walk on Barracks Row Heritage Trail - an Inhabited Alley in DC." Capitol Hill social blogger "Lit" describes a peaceful walk on Archibald Walk,
after the PSC meeting. She posts several good shots of the host elm in full bloom, in contrast to the pictures and video footage of a starkly bare tree during the winter 2015-2016 media bliz.
JUNE 10, 2016
Arafen Design: Tree House on the Walk. Arafen, a popular web site devoted to "Interior Architectural Detail" runs a tree house pictorial display with a picture of the Archibald Walk tree house.
FEBRUARY 25, 2016
Capitol Community News/The Hill Rag. "The Death of Archibald
Walk" and "Historic Preservation Fails Archibald Walk." Andrew Lightman, Hill Rag editor, runs two lengthy, highly biased pieces on the DC Historic Preservation regime's "failures" in regard to preserving the
historic walkway. The articles contain many factual inaccuracies because Lightman contacted objecting neighbors, and the ANC 6B-03 commissioner representing them, but not us before writing the articles. We were unaware that the HR was doing a feature
on the tree house before publication. Lightman portrays us as lawbreakers who refused to submit to ANC review of our project before construction. In fact, no permitting official had instructed us to do this. Lightman also claims that the
DIY tree house was built from a kit supplied by a (fictious) company, and describes its platform as being 70 SQF. The fort's footprint is less than 30 SQF. Nobody the editor interviews for the articles has ever been inside the tree house.
Lightman omits mention of how Ellen was only granted a public space construction permit after following senior DDOT officials specific instructions to apply for the authorization. He describes the tree house not as a temporary play fort but as a structure
in the same category as out-buildings with permanent foundations. And he presents the tree house as having been built in the property's front yard, when official land plats clearly show that it's located at the rear land boundary of the lot.
FEBRUARY 8, 2016
DC'ist Blog, "Capitol
Tree House Builders Plan Rescue." 43 Comments. DC'ist columnist Rachel Sadon writes about the family raising money to rescue the tree house and raise awareness of the dearth of tree house-building rules in DC.
*Scribd On-Line. The Psychas-Yee's Proposed DC Tree House Rules. Our "Rule-Making
Petition" to DDOT, the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs-Construction and the DC Historic Preservation Office, submitted in January 2016. The several city agencies the family petitioned ignored the detailed proposed rules (four pages).
https://www.scribd.com/doc/297526881/Read-Ellen-Psychas-and-Bing-Yee-s-proposed-treehouse-rules-in-full FEBRUARY 5
Hill Blogger, and retired US Dept. of State official, Sig Cohen Considers the Conflict Resolution Angle on the Castle Clash with "Washington's Latest Controversy over a Tree House." Cohen views conflict from the perspective of a retired
diplomat and mediator in the 'hood. He notes that the Psychas-Yees got every government authorization they were told was needed, yet the neighbors demanded more.
Washington Metro Bugle, "The DC Tree House Controvery." The Bugle considers the tree house controversy on January
8th, and again on the 9th, in "Morning Rundown #109."
w/reddit r/Washington DC Redditon Discussion. A reddit blog discussion about the location of the tree house. Most comments are pro-tree house. 13 Comments.
Conversations Blog, "Washington's Latest Controversy...Over a Tree House" A look at the tree house conflict by Hill-based community mediator Sig Cohen.
Scoop Nest On-line Tweets, Washington DC. Tree house photograph and statement regarding the PSC Ruling from Washington DC News@washdc.news.
JANUARY 29, 2016
*DC’Ist Blog: Poll “Should the City have Let the Tree House Stay Put?” This poll
on the popular DC blog pokes fun at tree house fever. More than 600 of 900 respondents voted that the city government should have left the tree house alone.
Fox 5 DC WTTG. "City Committee Votes Against Home Owners Tree House" by Tisha Lewis. The promised letter from the PSC "notfiying the owners of the next steps" has never come, for reasons unknown. Lewis
posted the article on Facebook.
WJLA ABC7, "DC Tree House has to Come Down." Probably
not, look for updates on this web site as the family stays in court.
News, "DC Committee Just Rules on the Tree Fort That Divided a Neighborhood Because of 20 Inches." Video Clip from ABC. Rare staff writer Kayleen Tanner highlights community support to move the tree house back 20 inches. She
notes that "even kids fun is regulated by Washington DC."
JANUARY 28, 2016
*The WASHINGTON POST Considers the Public Space Committee's Ruling that the Tree House Cannot Remain in Public Space with "The Tree House that Divided a Capitol Hill Neighborhood has to be Moved." 126
Comments. The article describes our initial reaction to the Commitee's ruling: we will inch our fort back to save it.
*The Iconic Magazine for Sport Hunters and Fishermen Considers
"The DC Tree House Controversy." Field & Stream editor Bill Heavey wants American kids to get outside more, including by playing in tree houses such as the Psychas-Yee's fort. He criticizes the DC city government and neighbors for
trying to interfere with getting kids outside.
UX Green Bay Press Gazette, "Permit Denied for Controversial Capitol Hill Tree House." This Wisconsin CBS affiliate reports on the story.
WUSA9 CBS Reports on DDOT's Public Space Committee Ruling with "Permit Denied for Controversial
Capitol Hill Treehouse." Cursory report summing up of how the PSC ruled, and what logic the members seem to be following in reaching their decision.
4 NBC Washington. "Permit Denied for Controversial Capitol Hill Tree House" and "Playtime
is Over in DC" on Facebook. 55 Comments. Victoria Jones reports on the PSC ruling and posts a quiz on Facebook, asking "Do you think this tree house should come down?" She writes that the Psychas-Yees told her they had been granted
a "temporary 10-day permit" which was not the case. DDOT "balcony" construction permits always close after a specified timeframe (in this case, 10 days) and don't need to be renewed after work has been completed.
Greater Greater Washington. "Tear this Tree House Down." Blogger Brandon Casey writes \of how the PSC denied a request to allow the Capitol Hill Tree house to enroach 20 inches into a public alley.
He doesn't mention that the tree house builders already had a permit for the "enroachment" (small projection into unpaved alley air space).
Scoop Nest On-line, "Permit Denied for Capitol Hill Tree House." The Daily Mail On-line newswire reports on the PSC ruling.
Juice On-line, Des Moines News Wire. "No Permit for Capitol Hill Tree House." Reporting on the tree house from the heartland, picked
up from the NBC wire.
Capitol Hill Corner Blogger Larry Janezich, "City Says No to Tree House on Archibald Walk." 7 Comments. Blogger Larry Janezich's third, and final, post on the tree house.
The PSC did not in fact say "no" to the fort itself. Members voted to overrule the 20" public space construction permit DDOT issued to the Psychas-Yees although the Committee lacks the authority to review, let alone revoke, closed
Janezich does not address the issue of unlawful ANC and PSC review of a closed public space permit the city agency has not lawfully revoked, the basis for the family's legal appeals. He describes the permit
as temporary (DDOT's spin to the media).
7 ABC WJLA. "DC Tree House to Come Down." Innacurate
reporting from Channel 7 on the PSC decision. The Psychas-Yees give statements to other media outlets that day stating that they will move the tree house back to save it.
JANUARY 21, 2016
The Play Atlanta Blog: Our Children Deserve a Child-Friendly City. Blogger Cynthia Gentry's post on the Capitol Hill Tree house controversy from the perspective of a child-friendly urban
planning advocate in the state of Georgia.
JANUARY 19, 2016
*SLATE MAGAZINE Describes how "Children's Tree House in DC Tests America's Committment to Liberty." The story makes national news. Slate reporter Nora Caplan-Becker calls
the tree house as a "monument to freedom." She terms the backlash in the media against the PSC ruling as "DC Treehousegate." She concludes by calling a "vote for tree houses is a vote for quality of life."
*Popville Blog, "The Infamous Capitol Hill Tree House." 70 Comments. Several
good photographs and mostly pro-tree house comments on the popular decade-old blog of the "Prince of Petworth," Dan Silverman, something of an urban tree house enthusiast. The pictures generate mostly pro-tree house comments, probably from
a younger and more child-minded group of readers than those who responded to Capitol Hill-based reports (CapitolCorner blog, the Hill Now blog, Capitol Community News/the Hill Rag).
Silverman followed up his first piece with an update a few days later.
Capitol Community News, "The Tree House Backlash Continues. Neighbors Battle over Alley Structure at the ANC 6B Meeting" Christine Rushton reports on the first of two January ANC 6B meetings. She reports
that the commissioners voted to recommend that DDOT withdraw the 20" balcony projection permit issued to the Psychas-Yees six weeks earlier. Her take on the ANC's role is inaccurate. The ANC vote simply noted that the type of permit DDOT issued
to the family was should not cover alley space. See the ANC letter to the PSC under the "Castle Paper Trail" header.
Washington Post, "The Real Way Building a Treehouse is Part of the War on Children" by Tom Toles. Short-op ed in response to Petula Dvorak's piece the day before. The award-winning editorial cartoonist Toles gets it
wrong: the parents did not in fact willfully "flout" zoning laws. On the contrary, they applied for, and were issued, a valid construction permit authorizing the tree house. Toles has never contacted the family.
JANUARY 18, 2016
*The WASHINGTON POST Columnist
Petula Dvorak Ruminates on "A War on a Tree House --and Childhood Itself." 368 Comments. Petula's 9-year-old reports that the tree house is "so cool." Did Dvorak's motivate DDOT's leadership to think twice
about generating more bad press for the City government?
DC Reddit r/washington dc Capitol Hill Tree House, Message Board. 108 comments, mostly along the lines of "The kids will outgrow the tree house in a few years, the neighbors and DDOT should just leave the thing alone."
*The WASHINGTON POST First Considers the Tree House Controversy with "This Tree House Extends 20 Inches into an Alley and It's Dividing a Community." Remarkably, this article generates 650 on-line comments,
a huge number for a Metro Section article. Marcou tells Dana Hedgpeth that the tree house builders should have "got a permit and gone through a process." Which permit? Which process? DC tree houses with footprints of
less than 50 SQF do not exist to DC government before they are built, apparently, including those that overhang the "property owner's street box" (the language of the Psychas-Yee's DDOT permit).
Popville "The Beautiful Life" Blog, "Random Reader Rant and/or Revel." Popville readers react to the WaPo article on the tree house war that same day. Readers comment on the Archibald Walk neighbors' outsized reaction to
a kid's fort off a scruffy alley off another alley. The conventional wisdom from Popville is that the neighbors, ANC6B and the PSC should have left the tree house, and the family, alone.
*DC Urban Moms (DCUM). "Residents Upset over Capitol Hill Tree House." 83 Comments, the most recent posted in September 2017. Thread
on the popular "DC Mommy Fight Site."
Fox 5 DC WTTG Takes a Look at "Where the Capitol Hill
Tree House Controversy is Heading." and "Neighbors Feuding over Tree House in Capitol Hill." Fox interviews the spokesman for the neighbors. The family declines to be interviewed after Fox reporters stake them out aggressively.
The Fox news desk editor apologizes to the family the following day.
JANUARY 14, 2016
The Hill Now Blog, "ANC Sides with Neighbors,
Votes to Oppose Tree House on Capitol Hill." Sean Meehan, real estate blogger, runs a biased headline without having contacted the Psychas-Yees. He fails to explain that the ANC merely voted to comment that DDOT issued the wrong type
of permit to the tree house builders. The ANC did not oppose the fort itself, or recommend to DDOT that the permit be revoked.
NBC Chicago 5, "DC Neighbors Spare over Castle-Style Tree House." Reporter Carissa Dimargo gives basics and posts half a dozen good pictures of the tree house. Metropolitcan Chicago tunes into the DC tree house story.
The story also
aired the West Coast, on the evening broadcast news for NBC Bay Area.
4 NBC Washington, "DC Neighbors Spar over Castle-Style Tree House." Reporter Mark Segraves interviews a neighbor, who claims that the tree house is in his front yard. In fact, the neighbor's front door opens onto
F Street Terrace. Indeed, none of the historic facades of the six Archibald Walk houses open to the walkway. The families decline to be interviewed, wanting privacy in face of the sudden onslaught of press coverage.
JANUARY 13, 2016
Capitol Hill Corner Blog, "ANC6B Votes to Oppose Tree House Extension
in Public Space"." 13 Comments. Janezich's second and least accurate post. His take on ANC 6B review of the 20" projection permit is that the commissioners vote to oppose the tree house's extension into
public space. In fact, the ANC leadership successfully steers the Commission to a vote merely indicating that DDOT should not have issued a "balcony" permit to cover the tree house overhang because such permits cannot cover public alley air space. The vote
left the door open for DDOT to take the ANC's objection to a balcony permit into account by issuing the family a different type of permit.
*WUSA9 CBS, "Tree House Controversy in a SE DC Community." The first TV news story
on the tree house. CBS' coverage draws several others local TV camera crews to the alley by the week's end. The spokeswoman for the objecting neighbors tells Channel 9 that “If it had been built on their property, you know,
that’s their business."
The WUSA story was picked up by the LAHU USA Today Network, including in the Lansing Slate Journal and the SCTimes.
JANUARY 11, 2016
Capitol Hill Corner Blogger Larry Janezich Breaks the Story, "Tree Masion
has Archibald Walk Residents Up in Arms" 33 Comments. Janezich talks to objecting neighbors, and quotes the ANC 6B commissioner advancing their cause, but does not contact us. The blogger
later accepts our family's invitation to visit the tree house. He then attends public hearings where the structure's future is debated. Janezich does not note that the platform of the roofless "tree mansion," quoting an objecting neighbor,
is less than 30 SQF.
We were angered that Janezich did not give us the opportunity to present opposing views to those expressed in this piece scooping the story. For example, his article doesn't provide background
as to the inappropriateness of the ANC 6B becoming involved in the tree house matter given that we held a closed construction permit before their zoning committee came at us. Neither does the local blogger mention that only one neighbor had complained
to the City about the tree house before DDOT evicted an alley forest (with large planters standing mid alley) dating to the 1990s. After the forest went, a dozen alley neighbors, blaming us for the loss of the forest, signed a petition to get the tree
house torn down.