The Capitol Hill tree house story has been covered by the Washington Post since late 2015, in several news stories and an op-ed piece. In the broadcast realm, footage of the tree house aired on local NBC
affiliates across the country in early 2016. TV audiences learned about what the media dubbed "DC Tree House-gate" from Chicago to Chattanooga and Madison, from Des Moines to the Bay Area. The story made Slate
Magazine and the USA Today Network on-line edition.
We've found it interesting to compare and contrast the coverage of that the tree house story generated from the Hill with that from farther afield.
Neighborhood commentators (CapitolHillCorner blog, Hill Now blog, Hill Rag) mostly cast the fort builders as willful law breakers. Local bloggers and journalists sought out quotes from the objecting neighbors to use in their
lead stories. They also interviewed the ANC 6B0-03 commissioner who represented the neighbors, but not the parents or any tree house supporters. By contrast journalists with a City-wide reach (WaPo,
DC'ist, Popville, Metro Bugle), the Channel 7 CBS WJLA and ABC WUSA9 TV news teams spun their coverage in a manner fairly sympathetic to the family. These commentators made the case for the City's failure to put
play fort or tree house-building rules on the books.
The coverage most supportive of the tree house builders was found in two magazines with a national reach - Slate Magazine and Field
and Stream. These writers presented the parents as having been caught in a mess of bureacracy in a capitol city where personal freedoms are incresingly curtailed, with the play fort as "monument to freedom." In short, the battle of the alley tree house narratives on the best use of 20" of alley air space over mulch was drawn along clear generational and geographical lines.
We draw your attention to the dozen links prefaced with stars. Dip into these reports to get a feel for how the coverage has tilted in favor of the tree house's survival over time.
DECEMBER 28, 2018
**The Popular DCist Food, Culture, Art & Events Blog Returns to the Tree House after a 3-year Break. Succint summary of developments in the Capitol HIll Tree House War by witty architectural writer Deane Madsen. He
pretty clearly has a soft spot for the tree house, and the short dragon-fly watchers who spend time in it.
JANUARY 16, 2018
**The DC Urban Turf Real Estate Blog Scoops the Story on the Federal Lawsuit. Blogger Nena Perry-Brown focuses on DDOT's alleged denial of due process to the tree house builders in
**The WASHINGTON POST Provides an Update on the Tree House Controversy after a 2-Year Break. Dana Hegepeth describes how Bing files suit in Federal court to challenge DDOT's abusive permitting practices. The article
generates several hundred comments.
Intellectual Take Out, a Refuge for Rational Discourse. "Is there a War on Childhood in America?" Blogger Lillie Thomas asks the question "Is there really a war on childhood?" She refers
to the "war" WaPo columnist Petula Dvorak had written about a year earlier in the context of the Capitol Hill tree house controvery, and similar battles elsewhere.
JANUARY 2, 2017
Popville "The Beautiful Life" Blog, "Well this [Treehouse] is Awesome." 17 Comments. Pictures of
a just-built tree house in 16th Street Heights NW which elicit entertaining comments from readers poking fun at the DC anti-tree house movement launched by some of the Archibald Walk neighbors.
AUGUST 30, 2016
LIT's Living on the Hill Blog, "Archibald Walk on Barracks Row Heritage Trail - an Inhabited Alley in DC." Capitol
Hill social blogger "Lit" describes a peaceful walk on Archibald Walk, after the PSC meeting. She posts several good shots of the host elm in full bloom, in contrast to the pictures and video footage of a starkly bare tree during the winter 2015-2016
Arafen Design: Tree House on the Walk. Arafen, a popular web site devoted to "Interior Architectural Detail" runs a tree house pictorial display with a picture of the Archibald Walk tree house.
FEBRUARY 25, 2016
Capitol Community News/The Hill Rag. "The Death of Archibald Walk" and "Historic
Preservation Fails Archibald Walk." Editor Andrew Lightman, Hill Rag editor, runs two lengthy and highly biased pieces on the DC Historic Preservation regime's "failures" in regard to preserving the
historic walkway. The articles contain a number of factual inaccuracies because Lightman communicated with objecting neighbors, and the ANC 6B commissioner representing them, but not to Bing or Ellen before writing the articles. The parents were
unaware that the HR was doing a feature on the tree house before publication. Lightman portrays the parents as willful lawbreakers who refused to submit to ANC review of their project before construction. In fact, no permitting official
had instructed the parents to submit to such a review. Lightman also claims that the fort, which is homemade, was built from a kit supplied by a (fictious) company, and describes its platform as being 70 SQF. The fort's footprint is less than 30 SQF.
Nobody Lightman interviews for his articles had ever been in the tree house.
Further, Lightman does not mention that Ellen was only granted a public space construction permit after following the specific instructions of
senior permitting officials. He describes the tree house not as a temporary play fort but as a structure in the same category as out-buildings with foundations. And he presents the fort as having been built in the property's front yard, when official
land plats show that it's located at the lot's rear boundary.
FEBRUARY 8, 2016
DC'ist Blog, "Capitol Tree House Builders Plan Rescue." 43 Comments. DC'ist columnist Rachel
Sadon writes about the family raising money in the community to rescue the tree house and raise awareness of the dearth of tree house-building rules in DC.
**Scribd On-Line. The Psychas-Yee's Proposed DC Tree House Rules. The family's "Rule-Making Petition" to DDOT, the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs-Construction and the DC Historic Preservation Office, submitted in
January 2016. The several city agencies the family petitioned ignored the detailed proposed rules (four pages).
**Capitol Hill Blogger, and retired US Dept. of State official, Sig Cohen Considers the Conflict Resolution Angle on the Castle Clash with "Washington's Latest Controversy over a Tree House." Cohen views
conflict from the perspective of a retired diplomat and mediator in the 'hood. He notes that the Psychas-Yees got every government authorization they were told was needed, yet the neighbors demanded more.
Washington Metro Bugle, "The DC Tree House Controvery." The Bugle considers the tree house controversy on January
8th, and again on the 9th, in "Morning Rundown #109."
Tough Conversations Blog, "Washington's Latest Controversy...Over a Tree House" A look at the tree house conflict by Hill-based community mediator Sig Cohen.
Scoop Nest On-line Tweets, Washington DC. Tree house photograph and statement regarding the PSC Ruling from Washington DC News@washdc.news.
JANUARY 29, 2016
**DC’Ist Blog: Poll “Should the City have Let the Tree House Stay Put?” This poll
on the popular DC blog pokes fun at tree house fever. More than 600 of 900 respondents voted that the city government should have left the tree house alone.
Fox 5 DC WTTG. "City Committee Votes Against Home Owners Tree House" by Tisha Lewis. The promised letter from the PSC "notfiying the owners of the next steps" has never come, for reasons unknown. Lewis
posted the article on Facebook.
WJLA ABC7, "DC Tree House has to Come Down." Probably
not, look for updates on this web site as the family stays in court.
News, "DC Committee Just Rules on the Tree Fort That Divided a Neighborhood Because of 20 Inches." Video Clip from ABC. Rare staff writer Kayleen Tanner highlights community support to move the tree house back 20 inches. She
notes that "even kids fun is regulated by Washington DC."
JANUARY 28, 2016
**The WASHINGTON POST Considers the Public Space Committee's Ruling that the Tree House Cannot Remain in Public Space with "The Tree House that Divided a Capitol Hill Neighborhood has to be Moved." 126
Comments. The article describes the Psychas-Yee's initial reaction to the Commitee's ruling: we will inch our fort back to save it.
**The Iconic Magazine for Sport Hunters and Fishermen Considers
"The DC Tree House Controversy." Field & Stream editor Bill Heavey wants American kids to get outside more, including by playing in tree houses such as the Psychas-Yee's fort. He criticizes the DC city government and neighbors for
trying to interfere with getting kids outside.
UX Green Bay Press Gazette, "Permit Denied for Controversial Capitol Hill Tree House." This Wisconsin CBS affiliate reports on the story.
WUSA9 CBS Reports on DDOT's Public Space Committee Ruling with "Permit Denied for Controversial
Capitol Hill Treehouse." Cursory report summing up of how the Committee ruled, and what logic the members seem to be following in reaching their decision.
4 NBC Washington. "Permit Denied for Controversial Capitol Hill Tree House" and
"Playtime is Over in DC" on Facebook. 55 Comments. Victoria Jones reports on the PSC ruling and posts a quiz on Facebook, asking "Do you think this tree house should come down?" She writes that the Psychas-Yees told her they had been
granted a "temporary 10-day permit" which was not the case. DDOT "balcony" construction permits always close after a specified timeframe (in this case, 10 days) and don't need to be renewed after work has been completed.
Scoop Nest On-line, "Permit Denied for Capitol Hill Tree House." The Daily Mail On-line newswire reports on the PSC ruling.
Juice On-line, Des Moines News Wire. "No Permit for Capitol Hill Tree House." Reporting on the tree house from the heartland, picked
up from the NBC wire.
Capitol Hill Corner Blogger Larry Janezich, "City Says No to Tree House on Archibald Walk." 7 Comments. Neighborhood blogger Larry Janezich's third, and final, post on the
tree house. The PSC did not in fact say "no" to the fort itself. Four members voted to overrule the 20" public space construction permit DDOT issued to the Psychas-Yees although the Committee lacks the authority to review, let alone
revoke, construction permits.
Janezich does not address the issue of unlawful ANC and PSC review of a closed public space permit the city agency has not lawfully revoked, the basis for the family's legal appeals. He
describes the permit as temporary (because this was DDOT's spin to the media). The ANC Commissioner for the tree house property is quoted as supporting the PSC's decsion not to allow the Psychas-Yees to "dedicate public space for exclusively
private purposes." Janezich does not challenge this assertion although, at the time of publication, scores of local children had played in the tree house.
7 ABC WJLA. "DC Tree House to Come Down." Innacurate reporting from Channel 7 on the PSC decision. The Psychas-Yees give statements to other media outlets that day stating that they will move the tree house back to
JANUARY 19, 2016
**SLATE MAGAZINE Describes how "Children's
Tree House in DC Tests America's Committment to Liberty." The story makes national news. Slate reporter Nora Caplan-Becker calls the tree house as a "monument to freedom." She terms the backlash in the media against
the PSC ruling as "DC Treehousegate." She concludes by calling a "vote for tree houses is a vote for quality of life."
**Popville Blog, "The Infamous Capitol Hill Tree House." 70 Comments. Several
good photographs and mostly pro-tree house comments on the popular decade-old blog of the "Prince of Petworth," Dan Silverman, something of an urban tree house enthusiast. The pictures generate mostly pro-tree house comments, probably from
a younger and more child-minded group of readers than those who responded to Capitol Hill-based reports (CapitolCorner blog, the Hill Now blog, Capitol Community News/the Hill Rag).
Silverman followed up his first piece with an update a few days later.
Capitol Community News, "The Tree House Backlash Continues. Neighbors Battle over Alley Structure at the ANC 6B Meeting" Christine Rushton reports on the first of two January ANC 6B meetings. She reports
that the commissioners voted to recommend that DDOT withdraw the 20" balcony projection permit issued to the Psychas-Yees six weeks earlier. Her take on the ANC's role is inaccurate. The ANC vote simply noted that the type of permit DDOT issued
to the family was should not cover alley space. See the ANC letter to the PSC under the "Castle Paper Trail" header.
JANUARY 18, 2016
**The WASHINGTON POST Columnist Petula Dvorak Ruminates on "A War on a Tree House --and Childhood Itself." 368 Comments. Petula's 9-year-old reports that the tree
house is "so cool." Did Dvorak's motivate DDOT's leadership to think twice about generating more bad press for the City government?
DC Reddit r/washington dc Capitol Hill Tree House, Message Board
108 comments, mostly along the lines of "The kids will outgrow the tree house in a few years, the neighbors and DDOT should just leave the thing alone."
JANUARY 15, 2016
**The WASHINGTON POST First Considers the Tree House Controversy with "This Tree
House Extends 20 Inches into an Alley and It's Dividing a Community." Remarkably, this article generates 650 on-line comments, a huge number for a Metro Section article. Marcou tells Dana Hedgpeth that the tree house builders
should have "got a permit and gone through a process." Which permit? Which process? DC tree houses with footprints of less than 50 SQF do not exist to DC government before they are built, apparently, including those that overhang
the "property owner's street box" (the language of the Psychas-Yee's DDOT permit).
Popville "The Beautiful Life" Blog, "Random Reader Rant and/or Revel." Popville readers react to the WaPo article on the tree house war that same day. Readers comment on the Archibald Walk neighbors' outsized reaction to
a kid's fort off a scruffy alley off another alley. The conventional wisdom from Popville is that the neighbors, ANC6B and the PSC should have left the tree house, and the family, alone.
**DC Urban Moms (DCUM). "Residents Upset over Capitol Hill Tree House." 83 Comments, the most recent posted in September 2017. Thread
on the popular "DC Mommy Fight Site."
Fox 5 DC WTTG Takes a Look at "Where the Capitol Hill
Tree House Controversy is Heading." and "Neighbors Feuding over Tree House in Capitol Hill." Fox interviews the spokesman for the neighbors. The family declines to be interviewed after Fox reporters stake them out aggressively.
The Fox news desk editor apologizes to the family the following day.
JANUARY 14, 2016
The Hill Now Blog, "ANC Sides with Neighbors,
Votes to Oppose Tree House on Capitol Hill." Sean Meehan, DC real estate blogger, runs a biased headline without having contacted the Psychas-Yees. He does not explain that the ANC merely voted to comment that DDOT issued the wrong type
of permit to the tree house builders. The ANC did not oppose the tree house itself, or recommend to DDOT that the projection permit be revoked.
NBC Chicago 5, "DC Neighbors Spare over Castle-Style Tree House." Reporter Carissa Dimargo gives basics and posts half a dozen good pictures of the tree house. Metropolitcan Chicago tunes into the DC tree house story.
The story also
aired the West Coast, on the evening broadcast news for NBC Bay Area.
4 NBC Washington, "DC Neighbors Spar over Castle-Style Tree House." Reporter Mark Segraves interviews a neighbor, who claims that the tree house is in his front yard. In fact, the neighbor's front door opens onto
F Street Terrace. Indeed, none of the historic facades of the six Archibald Walk houses open to the walkway. The Psychas-Yees decline to be interviewed by NBC, wanting privacy in face of the sudden onslaught of press coverage.
JANUARY 13, 2016
Capitol Hill Corner Blog, "ANC6B Votes to Oppose Tree House Extension in Public Space"." 13 Comments. Janezich's second and least accurate post. His take
on ANC 6B review of the 20" projection permit is that the commissioners vote to oppose the tree house's extension into public space. In fact, the ANC leadership successfully steers the Commission to a vote merely indicating that DDOT should not
have issued a "balcony" permit to cover the tree house overhang because such permits cannot cover public alley air space. The vote left the door open for DDOT to take the ANC's objection to a balcony permit into account by issuing
the family a different type of permit.
**WUSA9 CBS, "Tree House Controversy in a SE DC Community." The first TV news story on the tree house. CBS' coverage draws several others local TV camera crews to the alley by the week's end. The spokeswoman
for the objecting neighbors tells Channel 9 that “If it had been built on their property, you know, that’s their business."
The WUSA story was picked up by the LAHU USA Today Network, including in the Lansing Slate Journal and the SCTimes.
JANUARY 11, 2016
Capitol Hill Corner Blogger Larry Janezich Breaks the Story, "Tree Masion
has Archibald Walk Residents Up in Arms" 33 Comments. Janezich talks to objecting neighbors, and quotes the ANC 6B commissioner advancing their cause, but does not contact the Psychas-Yees. The
blogger later accepts the family's invitation to visit the tree house. He then attends public hearings where the structure's future is debated. Janezich does not note that the platform of the roofless "tree mansion," quoting an objecting
neighbor, is less than 30 SQF.
Bng and Ellen were angered that Janezich did not give them opportunity to present opposing views to those expressed in this piece scooping the story, which doesn't provide background as to
why ANC 6B became involved in the matter. The blogger does not mention that only one neighbor had complained to the city about the tree house before DDOT evicted an alley forest (with large planters standing mid alley) dating to the 1990s.