A Construction Permit Authorizes this DIY 30 SQF Tree House off a Capitol Hill Alley, yet the DC Government has Tasked 7 Senior Attorneys with the Job of Getting it Torn Down. We're Calling it Absurd Government Waste.


Welcome to the Capitol Hill tree house web site!  Let's start with informaton about the site itself, a little blog that's steadily gained steam over the years due to Washington Post coverage of the Archibald Walk tree house saga since the winter of 2015-2016. 

In early 2018 the Post reported that we'd countersued DDOT in Federal court, to challenge the agency's denial of due process in tree house permitting.  Prior to the paper's report, this web site had received fewer than 10,000 hits.  The counter now records almost 45,000 hits, even as the District's campaign to quash our children's play castle continues.  If you're a tourist who'd like to get off the beaten path on the Hill, come find the whimsical play fort that caused all the trouble at 516 Archibald Walk SE.  

Our FEDERAL COUNTERSUIT has been assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson.  Yes, she's the US District Court judge who's hearing the criminal cases against Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Roger Stone and Gregory Craig.  Visit Castle Paper Trail to have a look at key tree house case legal documents and meet America's busiest Federal judge in the Post.

On 12/28, the popular DCist: News, Food, Art & Events blog RAN A FEATURE on Not-in-My-Back-Alley squabbles in DC.  Deane Madsen, architectural writer, brings readers up to date on the tree house with the first media report poking fun at DDOT''s incompetent permitting work.  The witty Madsen notes that the agency sent citations to a "non-existent Mr. Lee," to fine him ($8,000) for failing to tear his tree house down. 



We hosted a high-spirited Hogwarts Castle birthday party for local 3rd graders in the alley on June 1st, with the support of some of the Archibald Walk neighbors. Who knew that the south arm of the Walk would make an ideal Quidditch pitchSEE PHOTOS.   

Ward 6 Cub Scout, Daisy Scout and Brownie Scout leaders, contact us if you're interested in bringing your den to the tree house for an educational summer BIRD WATCHING session at the old elm.  Click on Birding Activities for more information.

This spring, we said good-bye to our dear friend and hero, the indomitable Charity Tillemann-Dick, age 35.  She was instrumental in creating this web site in early 2016.  

This BLOG was created in early 2016, not long after the DC Department of Transportation (DDOT) had issued us, Hill tree house builders, with a public space construction permit and let the authorization close out.  That spring, we realized that neither of the zoning commissions that had come at our play fort over the winter--not the Advisory Neighborhood Commission 6B Planning & Zoning Committee nor the Public Space Committee (PSC)--had the authority to overrule building permits.  At that point--please excuse our gall--we decided to spread the word that the District is known to demand that homeowners demolish projects covered by valid permits, or face enormous fines for failing to comply with unlawful permit revocations.  Permit holder beware.

In the past year, DDOT LEADERS have repeatedly been called task by the city council members on the Committee on Transportation and the Environment for failing to make good progress in implementing the agency's Vision Zero initiative.  The scheme has the goal of reducing annual traffic deaths in DC to zero by the year 2024.  Sadly, there were at least 36 road fatalities last year, with ten more thus far in 2019.  This year, public outrage over unsafe DC streets has been generating negative press for DDOT.    

We believe that DDOT should prioritize spending taxpayer funds to bolster PUBLIC SAFETY rather than on wrecking kids forts.  The leadership of the agency's Public Space Regulation Division has lost persepctive on DDOT's core mission in tasking a team of attorneys with destroying a backyard tree house.  The permitted, homemade structure, built nine feet above our patio and a public-private mulched tree box, neither obstructs travel nor poses a threat to the public.  Nonetheless, one DC lawyer after another has been given the unenviable job of ensuring that it is "abated" (read demolished) from slightly overhanging unpaved public alley space.  See Castle Paper Trail for a list of the seven District lawyers who, embarrassingly, have authored tree house briefs.  Remarkably, the attorneys list includes a Deputy AG and the DC Solicitor General 

DC's nutty campaign to wreck a kids fort BUILT FOR AROUND $1,500 has already cost taxpayers six figures, mainly in senior staff time.  The City circles the wagons in a trifling zoning matter to warn homeowners not to challenge permitting wrongdoing, the stuff of political farce.  Children age out of their play forts, then families take them down, irregardless of the public resources thrown at destroying a particular structure.

DDOT's over-the-top REACTION TO OUR CHALLENGE to the agency's abuse of authority in tree house permitting clearly stems from from Post coverage of government wrongdoing: the newspaper has run several news stories and two opinion pieces on the tree house.  The result?  At an inconsequential hearing at the DC Court of Appeals last fall, the City turned up with four lawyers to contend with us, ordinary citizens representing ourselves in litigation.  The hearing wasn't the first time that the District had trained extraordinary legal on our plywood kids fort.  Last spring, several DC government attorneys, a DDOT division chief, and a senior forester all attended a dead-ended, six-hour-long court mediation session.  Yet DDOT could have ended litigation at any point along the way, freeing up City lawyers to do real work in the public interest, simply by agreeing to let the tree house alone while our girls are still young. 

Thus far, none of the CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS on the Committee on Transportation and the Environment (with DDOT oversight authority) has indicated a willingness to challenge the waste in question, a team of OAG attorneys trying to get a benign child's fort torn down, year after year.  The same can be said of ANC 6B's leadership.  Nonetheless, we will continue to ask our elected officials to use common sense.

1/28/19 marked the 3rd ANNIVERSARY of the PSC meeting at which the Chair, a DDOT official, tore up the closed permit authorizing the tree house in plain view.  Our message to the City has been that whenever permitting agencies unlawfully revoke a building permit like that, the District's investment climate takes a hit.  We hope that this bizarre little zoning case has helped expose DDOT permitting incompetence and ingrained homeowner-hostile practices.  If other homeowners are better able to defend rights conferred by public space permits in the future, as a result of our having challenged DDOT bumbling and wrongdoing, litigation will have been a small price to pay.  


Last year's joyful July 4th open house, the biggest yet, was great fun. Around 200 locals of all ages turned out, with arboreal travelers, ages 3-10, collecting stamps in their "tree house passports" in the elm.  Kids had fun firing off nerf arrows at targets on the south arm of the Walk.  See Photo Gallery for pictures of the event.  We're taking a break from an Independence Day open house in 2019, but are planning a trick-or-treating event. 

The Washington Post Metro Section ran this surprising report in mid January 2018, after finding our complaint via Pacer Legal Filings software:


The story about the federal countersuit was scooped by none other than the DC URBAN REAL ESTATE BLOG.  Their report explores why we are challenging DDOT's denial of due process in construction permitting.  Find a complete list of annotated tree house-related media links--there are four dozen--under Press Coverage



July 2015:  Ellen Psychas and Bing Yee, longtime Hill residents, ask permiting officials which authorizations will be required to build a tree house at Archibald Walk SE, several blocks south of Eastern Market.  The proposed kids fort would project over the tree box abutting their lot off an alley from which vehicles have long been banned.  The creative design would enable the builders to use a tall wooden fence with posts laid in concrete as supports, minimizing the drilling of 18-inch lag bolts into a century-old elm.  They learn that there is no reference to kids forts in the DC Municipal Regulations (DCMR) or Historic Preservation Rules.  They show officials project plans and are told that DC does not permit structures with footprints of less than 50 SQF. 

August-September 2015:  The tree house is built for the Yee girls, ages 3 and 5, by relatives and family friends.  Immediate neighbors are left courtesy notes telling them that a non-permitted fort will go up in the backyard elm tree, whose branches extend over alley space.  None react.  The 7' x 4' tree house cannot be viewed from a street.  

October-November 2015:  One Archibald Walk neighbor complains to DDOT that the fort was built in a public tree, and constitutes a public nuisance (both untrue).  A senior public space management inspector visits the alley and directs the parents to apply for a permit for the tree house to extend 20 inches into public air space over mulch.  The parents do as instructed right away, quickly securing the permit.  The DDOT City-wide permitting manager chooses the type and length of the authorization, which closes out on Nov. 20th.  This is the parents' first public space permit in any jurisdiction.

December 2015-January 2016:  A dozen alley neighbors and local supporters sign a tear-down petition addressed to Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) 6B.  The ANC reviews a permit "renewal" application the parents did not submit for a "proposed tree house" that's stood for months.  The "renewal" is of a "balcony construction" permit under a Dept. of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA) code.  This is clearly a permanent permit, vs. a limited-duration "public space rental" permit, e.g. for a street festival or temporary parking. The parents had not been instructed to submit to City review before being issued the permit, whose language does not state "temporary," or specify that the authorization would need to be renewed.  Neither does the permit state that the parents would need to apply for an applicable 2nd permit.  

A DDOT official goes into Ellen's permitting account to apply for the "renewal," unbeknown to her, and changes her password.  He memorializes his hacking in an email.  In October 2017, the parents will lodge a complaint with the FBI Internet Crimes Center.  The PSC denies the "renewal application," DDOT's crude attempt to take an administrative shortcut to revoking a closed permit after a group of neighbors had complained about the tree house. No permit revocation documents are ever served.  At public hearings, ANC 6B commissioners and senior DDOT officials dodge Bing's questions as to why the original building permit is not being respected.

February 2016-November 2017:  The parents appeal the permit application "renewal" denial at the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) and, eventually, the DC Court of Appeals.  DDOT ignores Bing's requests for clarification of the status of the original permit, which the agency now refuses to recognize.  DDOT fines the parents $8,000 for not "abating" the tree house from public space, with half a dozen Notices of Violation served in the wrong homeowner's name, to a "Mr. Lee" vs. a "Mr. Yee" (because all East Asian immigrants must be "Lees," like Bruce Lee...?).  The notices are served via certified mail, meaning that post office staff will not release them to Bing.

November 2017-January 2018:  DDOT refuses court mediation at OAH, even though the lead judge has already lined up a mediator, and deemed the tree house matter "small."  The Office of the Attorney General of DC (OAG) begins representing DDOT.  After two years of being on the receiving end of abusive administrative errors and shenanigans in public space permitting, Bing, a lawyer but not a litigator, and Ellen countersue DDOT.  They also sue the senior public space management officials most involved in tree house permitting, DDOT's Matthew Marcou and John Stokes.  

The parents represent themselves in the first complaint they file in any court of law.  The case is brought under the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), and other causes of action before the statute of limitations on various causes of action is to expire.  The parents' goal is simply to keep the tree house while their daughters remain in elementary school.  Alternatively, they would like fair compensation from the City for tearing the fort down, to build a replacement entirely on their lot.

February 2018:  DDOT/OAG argues that the parents' lawsuit is "not ripe" in US District Court, illogically, after having asserted that the case "is moot" at OAH.  The Court of Appeals dismisses DC's motion to throw out the appeal and refers the case to mediation.  City lawyers begin to insist that there was never a "permit renewal" process.  They now claim that the parents had actually applied for a 2nd permit, a mythical but mandatory "public space occupancy permit for balcony construction," denied by the PSC.  Evaluate DDOT's weird legal arguments for yourself at Castle Paper Trail.

March-April 2018:  DDOT/OAG tries to get the Federal case dismissed.  Mediation fails at the Court of Appeals, after DDOT refuses to leave the tree house alone for a few more years.  OAG lawyers seem confident that they will get the entire case thrown out.  

September 27th, 2018+:  The DC Court of Appeals hears oral arguments regarding vacating a DDOT stop-work-order that was likely illegal. The panel moots the apellate case.  The Federal case, however, continues as the parties wait for Judge Berman Jackson to rule on the status of the parents' countersuit.  END OF TIMELINE  

We've stayed in litigation to protest how we did what permitting officials required of us to build a legal tree house.  However, DDOT moved the goal posts on us as a result of internal dysfunction and administrative overreach.  An arbitrary project screening system also set the stage for litigation.  A paternalistic ANC had no business informing us that we should submit to City review to defend a closed construction permit, thereby abetting an unlawful permit revocation.  Why not?  Because DC Code 1-309.10(a), spelling out ANC powers, states that the commissions “may advise…with respect to all proposed matters of DC government policy…” Completed projects authorized by closed permits cannot be described as "proposed matters."  If an ANC has an issue with a project covered by a closed building authorization the City hasn't lawfully revoked, the commissioners' quarrel is with the issuing  agency, not the homeowner. 

The City's permitting games to demolish a play fort unpopular with a few neighbors has been enabled by a failed regulatory process in a jurisdiction supporting a byzantine construction permitting scheme.  DC's poorly explained and discretionary system for issuing (and withdrawing) homeowners' building authorizations, particularly those in public space and the DC Historic Districts, sets up a homeowner to have real difficulty defending rights under permits covering small projects, e.g. sheds, fences and play forts.

This narrative not only chronicles the evolution of a knock-down neighborhood fight over a tree house, it proposes measures the City could take to prevent history from repeating itself when a family sets out to build a backyard play space.  See Castle Paper Trail, Proposed Tree House Rules.  The conflict hasn't been as much about a kids fort as lack of accountability to the public on the part of the DC permitting agencies.  The story also encapsulates an urban community's struggle to balance the needs and interests of the old guard with those of the droves of young families putting down roots in neighborhoods.  What else could explain why a kids fort a stone's throw from the Capitol Dome has attracted media attention?  The story has not only appeared in the WaPo, it aired on four local TV stations in early 2016: NBC-4,CBS-7, ABC-9 and Fox-5.  Three years ago, NBC affiliates broadcast footage of the fort from coast to coast. 

Community Events at the Capitol Hill Tree House



Hill families stopped by the tree house after the local Independence Day parade on 8th Street, two blocks east in the past several years.  In January 2016, Slate Magazine's Nora Caplan-Bricker called the tree house "a monument to freedom."  That year, and in 2017 and 2018, changing neighborhood demographics were on vivid display in the alley as local kids, accompanied by parents and grandparents, have celebrated the play fort's survival.  The open houses drew about 100 children, giving them a chance to explore in the elm at these low-key celebrations.  We note that the former ANC 6B commissioner for the tree house property proclaimed to the press that we had dedicated public space for exclusively private purposes...with no benefit whatsoever to the public at large."  

The July 4th open houses were fun for young families in the community. Hill teens served as monitors in the elm, helping keep young visitors safe.  A rope-and-pulley controlled bird feeder system let kids fill several feeders from the alley.  Visiting children had fun playing Crusaders on the Walk in knights helmets.  Inside the fort, visitors banged a gong, rang farm bells, peered through a toy telescope, blew bubbles, had tea parties, tried out the climbing rocks on the tree trunk, raised a supplies bucket and drew on a chalkboard. Tree house frequent fliers mixed with first-time visitors, from babies to grandparents. A few neighbors who once opposed the tree house joined in.  Each Independence Day that the play castle survived to see another community event felt like a victory over run-of-the-mill construction permitting abuses in DC. 

An adhoc nerf arrows archery range was a draw at the open houses.  Arrows are trapped nicely by the 15-foot-high walls of the historic Walker Dairy warehouses sheltering the south arm of Archibald Walk.  A new generation of Hill residents appreciated a little-visited Hill walkway (historically, "Marks Alley"), making happy memories of participating in Independence Day celebrations by the tree house. 


Game of Capture-the-Castle, June, 2018.  Neighborhood children have grown attached to the creative tree house at open houses, play dates, parties and birdwatching events.  See Dress-Up Gatherings We're concerned that, if this tree house is demolished prematurely, it will be the last built in a DC Historic District for a generation.  The local historic preservationists who came at the structure would do well to explain how backyard play spaces pose a threat to ongoing architectural restoration efforts on the Hill.  Which old building is threatened by a child's fort?  We believe that the DC community can balance safety, heritage, public space and the need to promote outdoor play for children.  When City leaders help make the DC Historic Districts child-friendly zones, they encourage the young families making their lives in them to thoughtfully invest in their classic properties.  One result is that parents become motivated to help the Department of Public Works maintain public alleys providing access to play spaces.    

Alley Fencing: Foam Sword Battles for the Ages


The fall community open house was a wonderful time on a cold but sunny November afternoon.  Neighborhood kids converged on the Walk, with (foam) sword fighting emerging as the most popular activity.  More than 60 people rocked in to chat over pie and hot cider.  A hard-working teen tree house monitor kept good order up in the elm, giving the grown-ups below a chance to relax.  Alley visitors enjoyed filling the play fort's inventive pulley-and-rope-controlled bird feeders and bird bath.  See Photo Gallery.


What luck!  Seventy well-behaved knights from Mr. Tony's popular adventure camp, for ages 3-8, defended the castle in August.  They had help from a dozen stellar camp counselors.  The decade-old camp is a popular program for local children, serving hundreds each summer. The adventure campers honed their archery skills on the Walk and made pine cone bird feeders to take home.  We really enjoyed hosting the adventurers on their epic visit.  Come again! See Photo Gallery for more pictures.

DC Zoning Commissions have no Business Unlawfully Revoking Construction Permits for Kids Forts

So why would alley neighbors, ANC commissioners and DDOT officials team up to seek the unlawful revocation of a permit covering a child's fort?   

In summer 2015, Ellen and Bing worked to build a backyard tree house off the narrow "U"-shaped back alley.  The open fort, which encorporates elaborate safety and security features was painted blue and gray to match their SE house.  The structure was built in an environmentally-friendly manner.  The family hired a DDOT Urban Forestry Division-recommended arborist, to advise them on the care of their rare American elm, planted in the 1920s.  Elms are uncommon in DC, because more than 80% succumbed to Dutch Elm Disease decades ago.  The host tree is clearly thriving: the elm is in much better circulatory health than when the tree house was built in 2015.

Over the winter of 2015-16, ANC 6B got retroactive review of the family's closed out construction permit on the agenda of a meeting of the Public Space Committee, a city-wide zoning commission.  The Committee voted 4-0, with an abstention by DCRA-Construction, to overrule the permit, portending the tree house's immediate destruction.  However, since the PSC lacks the authority to revoke permits, the Committee was not within its rights to vote at all.  The Mayor's Order establishing the PSC didn't grant the body the power to withdraw permits.  The parents were unaware of ANC and PSC overreach at the time, having been told by City officials that post hoc review was mandatory.  They have since researched the relevant legal issues to mount an unsual series of legal challenges.  

At the PSC hearing in January 2016, the Chair strong-armed committee members to vote to tear down the play fort, insisting that the parents should have gone through a (non-existent) process for permitting DC tree houses.  But the window DDOT had to require the tree house builders to submit to City review was the time before they were issued a construction permit, versus after the permit had already closed out.  Find the PSC's unfathomable letter announcing the PSC decision under Castle Paper Trail.  What on earth were they getting at? 

Bing and Ellen have made steady progress in litigation.  After the PSC vote, they considered inching the fort's overhang over their land boundary to save it.  Eventually, they reached the conclusion that the relocation project would be too hard on the elm, and that the shifted fort would be destabilized.  Also, the parents had their eyes opened to post hoc City review of their project plans as a cynical effort to fool and pressure them to alter or destroy a legal structure authorized by a pre-existing permit.  They prefer to stay in litigation than to acquiesce to an unlawful permit revocation scheme.  

The authors of the tear-down petition, which some of the immediate neighbors refused to sign, argued that because the tree house clashes with its surroundings architecturally, it should be demolished.  Their petition reads  "The castle-theme...is incompatible with the rest of the neighborhood and therefore antithetical to the historic nature and existing streetscape."  In supporting documents, made public by ANC 6B, neighbors expressed concern that the kids fort would attract vagrants, prove unsafe, depress alley property values and tourism, irreparably damage the tree (owned by Bing and Ellen), fall into disrepair, and greatly compromise their privacy.  But none of this has happened, helping explain why the neighbors' campaign to destroy the fort had petered out by late 2016. 

The backlash against what Slate Magazine's Norah Caplan-Bricker dubbed "DC Treehouse-gate" in 2016 suggests that the public at large has not been swayed by the argument that a small play fort off a Capitol Hill back alley should be destroyed.  Local supporters have come forward to help the family in various ways.  The American elm has been pruned by a professional tree care company without charge, and donations have been made.  Supporters have included kids offering allowance money and Hill realtors who like showing the tree house to clients with young children.  

In late 2015, a DDOT inspector found dozens of large potted plants residents had been keeping in the alley for years.  DDOT forced the removal of the planters, a development for which the neighbors blamed the parents.  Their spokesman complained to the Post that the fort "encroaches on" and "overwhelms" the public space...."  Yet most neighbors who signed the tear-down petition can scarcely see the tree house from their lots.

Creating a Process for Permitting Tree Houses in the DC Historic Districts: It's 2019 and It's Time

The family would not only like to preserve the tree house, they'd like to see clear play fort-building rules enacted. To this end, in 2016, they petitioned the directors of DCRA, DDOT and the Historic Preservation Office for rule-making on tree house building.  See their petition, which the agencies ignored, here.  The rescue operation has been an opportunity to raise awareness that there is no niche in the DCMR for kids forts.  DC categorizes tree houses as non-permitted "playground equipment" or "accessory sheds," overly broad categorizations creating permitting confusion over arboreal forts. 

The parents' committment to preserving the banged-up historic alley their fort overlooks has been made clear since 2011, when they lobbied DDOT to repave its very badly degraded surface. The paving project, the first in decades, improved alley conditions, particularly drainage.  Archibald Walk was occupied by a large swarm of insects in warm weather before repaving.  The family's contribution to keeping up the neglected narrow alley, which they often clean up, is apparent to long-time visitors to Archibald Walk SE.  

Without specific rules related to play or tree house-building in DC, unlike in many other US cities, the door is left open to permitting adhocery.  More than one permitting official took the position that the fort's design broke none of the tree space rules for owners of adjoining lots, spelled out in DCMR Rule 24-109.3.  The permit even references "the property owner's street box."  In 2017, the rule was amended to read that a "structure" cannot overhang a tree space, surely as a reaction to the tree house war.  With the amended rule, the law has been updated, meaning that no DC homeowner could build another such structure legally.  Thus, no dangerous precedent for tree house-building in the District would be set by DDOT opting to leave this kids fort alone.

It Takes a Tree House to Call Attention to DDOT Permitting Abuses Directed at Ordinary Homeowners

Ellen and Bing have gone to court to defend rights granted by a permit DDOT came to regret issuing.  Agency oficials opted to harness a bogus retroactive "review" of the authorization to tear it up. This type of casual permitting malfeasance, targetting ordinary homeowners who build small projects and probably can't fight back, is seldom challenged in the District. 

DDOT's "review" was government gone awry: the PSC Chair declared the tree house illegal to the WaPo in advance of the specious hearing, without even the pretense of impartiality.  Afterward, media attention brought the family advice from real estate professionals wise to City permitting games.  Architects and contractors reached out, urging the parents to challenge DDOT's bad faith, because, under DC law, a building permit like theirs is a closed chapter absent a legal permit revocation process.   

Public Access to the Play Fort - DC Children Welcome:

In the last several years, the whimsical tree house has become a community resource.  Look for announcements of neighborhood open houses Moms on the Hill (MOTH) along with the several Nextdoor.com Eastern Market area list servs. In addition to holding open houses, the family has developed the fort as a bird-watching platform for children. Occasionally, DC Boy and Girl Scout groups visit, to enable young naturalists to work on scout birding merit badges.  Youth group, school group, and day camp leaders can send requests for small groups of children to visit the tree house.  See Birding Activities.  

The Tree House on Capitol Hill Neighborhood Tours:

Come find the tree house!  The unique play fort has become something of a Hill landmark since the 2016 media blitz.  Ellen and Bing first opened the tree house to the public on Mother's Day Weekend 2016, during the Capitol Hill Restoration Society House & Garden Tour.  The family invited tour-goers to explore the fort, prompting several hundred CHRS event ticket holders to stop off at their SE patio.  

The guided Capitol Hill Food Tour, and the "Barrack's Row Tour of Duty" walk, often bring tourists by the tree house.  The authors of the tear-down petition argued that the struture "impairs the public use and enjoyment of this space...and the enjoyment of neighborhood tours which transit Archibald Walk" with the fort "disrupting the integrity and visual beauty of the alleyway."  Their view has not been universally shared.  Local tour guides will tell you that visitors sometimes ask to be shown the sweet tree house they saw on TV news a few years ago, or read about in the Post.  Tourists walking by snap pictures and call out encouragement to kids to "Defend the castle!"  

Having trouble finding the tree house?  Try searching for "East Archibald Walk" on Google Maps, where a photo of "Tree House of Contention" may pop up at the bottom of the screen.  If you don't plug the "East" into your GPS, you may not be directed to one of two alley entrances off F St. Terrace behind Christ Church, paved in gray asphalt pavers, running north to south between E and G Streets SE, behind Christ Church.  

Parting Thoughts on the Future of DC Tree Houses:

Going forward, the construction of tree houses should be regulated in the District, but in a way that encourages families to build them responsibly to promote outdoor play.  In a society where most urban youth spend too much time inside, the City should not be in the business of encouraging sedentary lifestyles for local children by making backyard kids forts difficult to build, and even harder to preserve.  

Discouraging homeowners in the DC Historic Districts from building tree houses is short-sighted in a city with many large trees in residential neighborhoods.  The unlawful revocation of building permits by the government is another losing strategy in a municipality that has long struggled to rein in abuse of authority and dysfunction on the part of its administrative agencies, dampening statehood prospects. 

Homeowners in the District have a right to know exactly what they are, and aren't, allowed to build, no matter how large or small a construction project might be.   

To urban tree houses as places of joy and discovery!

Friends of the CH Tree House

Photos courtesy of julieannwoodford.photoshelter.com and Ellen Psychas of rescuetreehouse@gmail.com

Thanks for stopping by.  Capitol Hill visitors and residents who haven't seen the tree house, please come find it and draw your own conclusions.